Details for: SCE's Comments on Draft Resolution E-5045 (SCE Advice 3859e_ea et al).pdf


Click on the image for full size preview

Document data

Gary A. Stern, Ph.D.
Managing Director, State Regulatory Operations

March 25, 2020
Energy Division
California Public Utilities Commission
505 Van Ness Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Re:

Comments of Southern California Edison Company
on Draft Resolution E-5045

Dear Energy Division:
Pursuant to Rule 14.5 of the California Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission’s)
Rules of Practice and Procedure, Southern California Edison Company (SCE)
appreciates the opportunity to submit these comments on Draft Resolution E-5045
(Draft Resolution).
SCE appreciates the Draft Resolution’s recommendation to confirm the Energy
Division’s non-standard dispositions issued on April 2, 2019 that approved Pacific Gas
and Electric Company (PG&E) and SCE’s 2019 energy efficiency Annual Budget Advice
Letters (ABALs). SCE agrees with the findings in the Draft Resolution that PG&E and
SCE met all ABAL review criteria and used the cost-effectiveness tool (CET) correctly,
as developed and administered by the Energy Division.
As such, SCE supports the Draft Resolution’s recommendation without objection. SCE
appreciates the opportunity to offer these comments.
Southern California Edison Company

/s/ Gary A. Stern, Ph.D.
Gary A. Stern, Ph.D.
GAS:mp:jm
cc:

Edward Randolph, Director, CPUC Energy Division
Peter Franzese, CPUC Energy Division
Alison LaBonte, CPUC Energy Division
Service List for Draft Resolution E-5045 and R.13-11-005

P.O. Box 800

8631 Rush Street

Rosemead, California 91770

(626) 302-9645

Fax (626) 302-6396





- Page 1 -